We’re often asked why teams don’t receive feedback from judges after an event about what they did well and what they could improve.
There are a few important considerations:
Judging is confidential
Judges discuss and compare teams, so detailed feedback could reveal information about other teams or the deliberation process.
Judging is event-specific
Different volunteer judges may reasonably assess teams differently. The rubrics help judges compare teams at a particular event; they aren't designed to explain why a team did or didn't receive an award.
Feedback without context can be unhelpful
A volunteer judge may not know the team's history, goals, or development. Feedback that sounds constructive could actually be discouraging or misleading.
The best time for feedback is before the event
Teachers and coaches know their teams and can use the rubrics to provide meaningful, immediate feedback while students still have time to improve.
The rubrics were developed in collaboration with a teaching college specifically to support teachers and coaches. They provide educators with a framework to use with their teams throughout the competition season, helping students evaluate their progress, identify areas for growth, and receive timely, meaningful feedback from someone who understands their team and its development.
Best Practices for Teams
Teams should use the rubrics throughout the season:
- Have students regularly self-evaluate against the rubric.
- Conduct practice interviews with a coach, mentor, teacher, or other trusted adult.
- Periodically review the notebook and look for gaps or areas to strengthen going forward.
- Ask students to explain why they made design, programming, and strategy decisions—not just what they did.
- Use feedback to set specific goals for the next competition.
- Have teammates practice interviewing and giving each other feedback.